Diverse Issues in Higher Education January 18, 2012 Educators: Obama's Vision for STEM Needs Greater Congressional Buy-in by Reginald Stuart When President Barack Obama rolled out his higher education agenda early in his term, his ambitious goals were widely embraced by higher education leaders and major employers across the country as the right ideas at the right time for America. Today, as Obama readies for a re-election bid, support for his goals seems as strong as ever in the higher education community. Less than hoped for has been realized, for sure, they acknowledge. They say some of Obama's efforts have fallen victim to a stubborn economy that is generating far less tax revenue for the government to fund his and other programs. His agenda also has been hurt by divisive bickering among political leaders at all levels of government over spending priorities and education funding. The score on his first term, observers say: mixed, with an explanation. "Given the gravity of the issues with which he's been dealing and the lack of positive responses, he's done well," says Dr. Charlie Nelms, chancellor of North Carolina Central University, agreeing with the sentiments of others. "He (Obama) had to use a lot of political capital on the health care bill and a lot of energy on the deficit," Nelms says. "He's had two wars and the economy. It's pretty clear bipartisanship hasn't been there." Obama came out the gate with myriad big ideas for American higher education. Basing much of his case for action on an assortment of studies showing steady slippage by the United States in educational achievement compared to other industrialized nations, Obama challenged education leaders and employers to step up their game lest the nation continue to fall behind in educating the kinds of knowledgeable people needed to keep the nation competitive. He set a goal for the nation of boosting its college graduation rate by 20 percent by 2020, with special emphasis on training students in science, technology, engineering and math, or STEM. To reach the big goal and make college more affordable for more people, Obama proposed pouring hundreds of millions more federal money into higher education with greater support for community colleges, tax credits for parents with children in college and replacing the student loan guarantee program with lower-cost direct government loans. Most significant to colleges serving low-income students, Obama proposed significant enhancements for the Pell Grant program, including boosting the size of individual Pell Grants and changing the program's status to that of an entitlement program. The agenda moved ahead with some degree of success for a while, despite opposition, mostly from Republicans. Then came the mid-term elections in November 2010. Democrats lost control of the House of Representatives, thrusting Obama's overall agenda, including his plans for higher education, into the path of even stronger headwinds of opposition. The higher education tax credit became law as did the overhaul of the student loan program eliminating the middleman (banks and other private lenders) and lowering student borrowing costs. The long-term plans for significant increases in funding for community colleges have not fared well. Meanwhile, Republicans, asserting they were trying to rein in federal spending, blocked efforts to change the status of the Pell Grant to a guaranteed entitlement and forced Obama to give up funding of summer Pell Grants in exchange for raising the maximum amount of an individual grant by $500 to $5,500. Republicans had wanted to lower the grant maximum to $4,800. They have vowed to continue their budget cutting efforts, including Pell Grant funding, if they keep control of the House. "We're at a real crossroads right now," says Edith Bartley, director of government affairs for the United Negro College Fund. She echoes the thoughts of others in expressing uneasiness about the future of once reliable help for colleges with a history of serving racial minorities. "Unfortunately, with the economy and climate in Congress, we're in the process of chartering some uncharted waters," says Bartley. Dr. Glen Jones, interim provost at Arkansas State University and president of the National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education, shares Bartley's sentiments. Jones agrees with others in saying he did not think Obama was overly ambitious in his call to arms, that there is ample data supporting bold steps to address what some are calling an emerging crisis in American education. "People in general support the vision, but it is directly limited by the lack of funding," says Jones. "I don't think his (Obama's) advisers realized what it would take to achieve it." Jones says "a lot of people support Obama's vision." He thinks the president just needs to do a better job of getting a greater buy-in from a wider base of people. "It's a vision that has to be owned by the people, not just the president," Jones says. Delaware State University President Dr. Harry Williams, who gives Obama high marks for his "aggressive agenda," says "institutions on the ground," such as his college, now need to "work even harder to make those things happen. The reality, in terms of what he's (Obama) up against, it's an uphill battle," says Williams. "I know we are going to have to do our part," he says. "I think we can get there. I'm optimistic." SANDRA M. PHOENIX Executive Director HBCU Library Alliance sphoenix@hbculibraries.org<mailto:sphoenix@hbculibraries.org> www.hbculibraries.org<http://www.hbculibraries.org/> 404.592.4820 Skype:sandra.phoenix1 1438 West Peachtree Street NW Suite 200 Atlanta, GA 30309 Toll Free: 1.800.999.8558 (Lyrasis) Fax: 404.892.7879 www.lyrasis.org<http://www.lyrasis.org/> Honor the ancestors, honor the children.